| |
|
| |

More
English sole respond early to the foot-rope in the dark (as
opposed to letting the gear hit them or pass over then) than
do English sole in the light. This suggest that English sole
will tend to be more vulnerable to capture by trawl gear at
night than during the day, a result that will need to be confirmed
through field experimentation. |
2002
Lewis Barnett
Oregon State University
Project: Effect of ambient illumination on the behavioral response
of juvenile English sole to disturbance by a bottom trawl footrope
(Supervisor: Cliff Ryer,
NOAA/NMFS Alaska Fisheries Science Center)
Quotas
for commercially valuable fish species are often limited by "bycatch";
those fish which are inadvertently captured along with the target
species. Understanding how fish respond to fishing gear under various
conditions will aid in the design of fishing strategies and gears
that reduce bycatch. In this study, an OSU intern, Lewis Barnett
and his advisor, Clifford Ryer, eamine how the presence or absence
of light effect the behavioral response of English sole Parophrys
vetulus to bottom disturbance caused by an approaching (trawl) foot-rope.

Click
to view MPG: A trawl foot-rope, propelled through
a 40 ft seawater tank in the laboratory simulates the
bottom disturbance created by a real trawl, allowing detailed
examination of behavioral responses of fish using digital
video. Measurements are made in the light and the dark
(using infrared illumination, to which fish are insensitive).
|
|

Click
to view MPG: Flatfish are herded by the foot-rope
of a commercial trawl, eventually tire, then fall back
to become part of the catch. (Video courtesy of Craig
Rose, AFSC). |
|
|